speechseal.gif (3455 bytes)L. B. E. S. P. A.

Louisiana Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology

Spring 2002

Printed Newsletter Editor: Gay T. Vekovius / Online Newsletter Editor: Onesimus Internet Solutions, Inc.

Table of Contents

Where Do Your Fees Go? Legal and Ethical Issues in Supervision LBESPA Promulgates Rules Change
Is Your License at Risk? Citizens’ Advocacy Conference Medicare Program Memorandum
FAQs Open Book Exam on the Code of Ethics Board Members 2002
Contact/Staff New Licensees

Where Do Your Fees Go?

The Louisiana Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (LBESPA) is charged by law with public protection and standardization of the requirements for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology licenses. The Board receives no funding from the state's general fund but operates solely on self-generated funds from license and renewal fees.

LBESPA's fees are used for a variety of activities; however, first and foremost is the license and renewal process. To accomplish this task, LBESPA maintains a full-time office, pays salaries for employees, and negotiates contracts for various professionals to provide needed services, such as legal, investigative, and financial, to name a few. The Board maintains a Video Library and sponsors an annual conference for the continuing education of licensees. In addition, Board members support the continuing education programs of two professional organizations, the Louisiana Speech-Language-Hearing Association (LSHA) and Speech-Language Pathologists in Public Schools Association (SPALS).

The Board maintains a website (www.lbespa.org) for public information and easy access to records and our staff. Currently the public can search our database of licensed practitioners to verify an individual's credentials or to find needed services in a specific area. LBESPA supports the continuing education of board members and staff and investigates between 15 and 30 complaints annually. While we share our licensees concern for the costs of licensing, we see the need for public protection and standardization of the requirements for licensure in the State of Louisiana

[Back to Top]

Legal and Ethical Issues in Supervision

In your current job, do your job duties include providing supervision? What are your responsibilities? Have you ever had an academic course or attended continuing education activities in supervision? How would you define your supervisory style? Does the process of supervision make you responsible for the action of others? Are you legally and ethically liable for the individuals you supervise?

Many professionals learn to supervise by being the recipient of supervision (Guest & Dooley, 1999; Newman, 2001; Rassi, 2002; Remley & Hendren, 1989). The assumption exists that being supervised teaches the skill of supervision. As a consumer, would you want a physician whose sole knowledge of medicine was obtained by going to the doctor?

Many practicing professionals consider supervision a duty, but may not understand the legal issues involved. Understanding the process of supervision enables navigation of the encompassing legal and ethical issues in supervision. Remley and Hendren (1989) state that it is important to realize the similarities that exist in ethical and legal issues. With all things, there are inherent risks especially when becoming responsible for the actions of others. Regardless of job or title, if you are supervising a student, colleague, or employee, you could be legally and ethically responsible for their actions.

There is potential for malpractice in the provision of supervision. Guest and Dooley (1999) stated a supervisor should be aware of the potential for malpractice. The authors outlined the "elements of malpractice as duty of care, standard of care, harm, and proximate cause" (p. 270). Although these are rather legal terms, further examination of each of these issues is relevant to speech-language pathology and audiology.

“Duty of care” implies that a contract exists (p. 271). The supervisor/supervisee relationship could be considered equivalent to the therapist/client relationship. For instance, the elements of trust and power are exhibited in both relationships.

Voluntary organizations (e.g., ASHA, LSHA, SPALS, or teacher unions) or state laws (e.g., LBESPA) establish “standards of care” through codes of ethics. Malpractice would consist of disregarding the “standard of care” in such a way that it would be evident to the consumer, or peer experts.

“Harm” can exist at a physical or subjective level. “Harm” could consist of overextension of the supervisee, and consequent injury. Guest and Dooley (1999) define consequent injury as "behavior from the supervisor that may cause the supervisee to lose income or be unable to obtain licensure" (p. 272). Subjective “harm” was defined as the frequently used terms "pain and suffering" (p. 272). Finally, if harm is established “proximate cause” could be proven.

In order to avoid the legal and ethical liabilities of supervision, SLPs and audiologists are advised to:

bulletseek training in supervision
bulletrefrain from supervision until educated
bulletsupervise only in the area of competence (Newman,2001)
bulletdevelop contracts with supervisees outlining duties and responsibilities
bulletpractice risk management
bulletevaluate performance of supervisees on an ongoing basis.

As professionals, speech-language pathologists and audiologists must become aware and educated about the process of supervision. Through awareness and education, speech-language pathologists and audiologists can avoid legal and ethical liabilities.

References

Guest, C.L. & Dooley, K. (1999). Supervisor malpractice: Liability to the supervisee in clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38 (4), 269-276.

Newman, W.S. (2001). The ethical and legal aspects of clinical supervision. ASHA Special Interest Division 11, Administration and Supervision Newsletter, 11, (3), 18-22.

Rassi, J.A. (2002, February). Understanding supervision and making it effective. Paper presented at the Mid-South Conference on Communicative Disorders, Memphis, TN.

Remley, T. P & Hendren, G.R. (1989). Legal liability of supervisors. Rehabilitation Education, 3, 177-183. Kerri Phillips

 

 

Kerri Phillips, L-SLP

LBESPA Board Member

[Back to Top]

LBESPA Promulgates Rules Change

With the advent of universal hearing screening and the use of support personnel to perform the screenings has come the need to develop more definitive guidelines relative to the duties and supervision requirements for audiology aides. Medicaid recently expressed concern about reimbursement for hearing screenings that were being performed by individuals who were neither properly trained nor appropriately supervised. This issue, coupled with complaints that other audiology support personnel were performing tasks far beyond their scope of practice, led LBESPA to draft proposed rules changes that would ensure protection of the consumers of our services in all work settings.

The proposed changes re-define aides to include all individuals who perform tasks prescribed, directed, and supervised by speech-language pathologists and audiologists. The changes relate more specifically to audiology by establishing minimurn supervision requirements and by outlining the duties that aides can perform for audiologists who supervise these support personnel. Supervision requirements are consistent with those established by the Office of Public Health for the newborn hearing screening program and provide for periodic direct observation during the initial year of the aide's employment and for subsequent years. Duties allow for the performance of all hearing screening tests and for the administration of pure tone air conduction threshold tests without interpretation. Licensed speech-language pathologists and licensed audiologists will continue to be legally, ethically, and morally responsible for the services provided by aides working under their direction.

It is anticipated that the proposed changes will resolve some of the concerns related to individuals performing duties outside their scope of practice as well as address the reimbursement issues raised by Medicaid and other third party payers. A public hearing on the proposed changes is scheduled for Thursday, March 29, 2002, at 9:00 A.M. in the LBESPA Board office. The deadline for receipt of all written comments is 4:00 P.M. on Thursday, March 28, 2002.

[Back to Top]

Is Your License at Risk?

The State of Louisiana has given the Department of Social Services (DSS) the authority to suspend licenses of parents who are delinquent in their child support payments. Driver's licenses, motor vehicle registrations, hunting and fishing, professional and occupational licenses can be suspended.

Speech pathology and audiology licenses are included among those in jeopardy. The Board has been notified by DSS that we must transmit the names and addresses of all the licensees four times a year. The first submission of licensed speech pathologists and audiologists was sent to DSS in January, 2002.

There are 45,000 to 50,000 child support collection cases that meet the criteria for license suspension. By the end of March or early April, the first licenses could be suspended. Certified letters of notification are being mailed by the Department of Social Services advising non-paying parents that their case is targeted for administrative license suspension.

[Back to Top]

Citizens’ Advocacy Conference

Yvonne Fowler, Public Member of LBESPA, attended the 14th Annual Citizens Advocacy Conference in Philadelphia, PA - November 14-16, 2001. She found the session on “Capitalizing on Public Members to Enhance a Board’s Credibility and Accountability” most interesting. Topics discussed included: the number of public members on a licensing board, the acceptance of complaints by telephone, and posting a sign in licensees’ workplaces to inform consumers of contact information for reporting problems.

Ms. Fowler reports “Louisiana seems to rank very high where regulation of health care professions is concerned. LBESPA is a dedicated professional board and I am honored to be a part of this board.”

 

 

Yvonne M. Fowler, Public Member
Appointed by Governor Foster October 17, 2001 to serve a 3 year term, expiring August 15, 2004.

[Back to Top]

Medicare Program Memorandum

The following information is provided by Susan Lemonier, CCC-A/SLP and Dean Marie Lofaso, Claims Manager, with Slidell Ear, Nose and Throat Association. The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) issued a Medicare Program Memorandum (Transmittal B-01--34) clarifying that Medicare carriers may not automatically deny coverage of hearing tests because they result in a diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss (CPT code 389.10).

If payment for audiological services has been denied in Louisiana Practices that provide for Medicare recipients, please contact Dr. Lynn Hickman at P.O. Box 83830, Baton Rouge, LA 70884-3830 (telephone number: 225-231-2114) to discuss procedures for payment.

[Back to Top]

 FAQs

Question: I was a practicing speech-language pathology assistant in a state where assistants were not required to be licensed. I worked in the schools and had a teaching certificate in that state. Although I have a bachelor's degree in speech-language pathology, I did not have any practicum experience other than my observation hours. I have been told that I will not be eligible for licensure in Louisiana. Is there any way the 100-hour practicum requirement can be waived?

Answer: The 100-hour practicum requirement is considered to be minimal and cannot be waived The standards for obtaining licensure as an assistant in Louisiana were based on much research, the input of practitioners, and careful consideration of the tasks that would be performed and the clients that would be served. In addition, LBESPA is bound to uphold Louisiana law and cannot deviate from the qualifications for licensure that have been enacted in law and adopted as rules under the legislative oversight process. Further, if seeking employment in a Louisiana school system, it would appear that the qualifications for an ancillary teaching certificate also would not be met, as specified on page 124 of Louisiana Bulletin 746, Louisiana Standards for State Certification of School Personnel ("An ancillary certificate for Speech/Language Pathology Assistant-Level 1, valid for three years and renewable, may be issued to an individual who has earned a baccalaureate degree in speech/language pathology from a regionally accredited institution and has completed at least 100 clock hours of supervised clinical practicum.")

Question: As the audiology supervisor of a hospital-based infant hearing screening program, I often train nurses as well as aides to perform the screenings. Am I legally and ethically responsible for the nurses even though they are regulated by their own licensure board?

Answer: Yes, anyone acting as an audiologist in charge of supervising newborn hearing screening must abide by the practice act and the Rules, Regulations and Procedures, including the Code of Ethics. The practice of audiology, the governance of which is specified in Act 892 of the 1995 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature, cannot be separated from the totality of the infant hearing screening program, including instances in which personnel other than those regulated by LBESPA are the individuals that actually carry out the screenings.

 [Back to Top]

Open Book Exam on the Code of Ethics

Two years ago LBESPA copyrighted an open book exam on Act 892 (the practice act) and one on the Rules and Regulations. The exams have been used for educational purposes and as part of sanctions imposed on licensees who violate the licensing statute. Work has recently been completed on a two-part open book examination pertaining to the LBESPA Code of Ethics. Part I of the ethics exam pertains to the practices of both speech-language pathology and audiology and presents examples of situations or scenarios that violate the Code of Ethics. Licensees are asked to indicate which specific principle(s) have been violated. Part II requires a higher level of ethical decision-making by presenting detailed scenarios depicting possible violations of the Code of Ethics. The multiple-choice answer that represents the best ethical decision must then be selected. Part II of the exam has situations geared to the type of license held and contains a test specifically designed for speech-language pathologists, one for audiologists, and one for assistants. Plans are underway to submit Part I for copyrighting. Part II will not be copyrighted at this time as LBESPA plans to change and update the scenarios from time to time.

It is becoming more common for states to require applicants for a speech-language pathology or audiology license to complete an examination on the enabling statute that governs the practice in that state. While LBESPA has no plans to incorporate an exam as part of the application process, the Board will continue to employ the copyrighted exams to educate its licensees. It should be noted that Louisiana is the only state thus far to have obtained a copyright on exams specific to speech-language pathology and audiology licensing.

[Back to Top]

Board Members 2002

bulletGlenn M. Waguespack, L-AUD, Chair
bulletKerrilyn Phillips, L-SLP, Vice-Chair
bulletAnnie Mouton, L-SLP, Secretary/Treasurer
bulletMelinda Peat, L-AUD, Board Member
bulletTheresa H. Rodgers, L-SLP, Board Member
bulletYvonne Fowler, Public Member
bulletLawrence Braud, M.D., Medical Advisor

[Back to Top]

CONTACT LBESPA

LBESPA
18550 Highland Road, Suite B
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
(225) 756-3480 Telephone
(225) 756-3472 Fax
Email: aud-slp@lbespa.org

Website: www.lbespa.org

Staff:

bullet

Suzanne Pevey, Administrator

bullet

Judy Graham, Administrative Assistant

bullet

Deborah Pratt, Clerical Assistant

bullet

Terry Martin, Clerical Assistant

bullet

Newsletter Editor: Gay T. Vekovius

[Back to Top]

NEW LICENSEES  (July 1, 2001 - March 5, 2002)

Adkins, Melissa

Almond, Lisa

Ard, Becky

Bailey, Angela

Banwell, Carly

Barranco, Melanie

Bauer, Casey

Bauer, Courtney

Beazley, Sharon

Beck, Bridget

Bell, T. Michelle

Bourne, Karen

Branch, Linda

Brewer, Tammy

Bridges, Latonia

Broussard, Alison

Broussard, S.

Brown, Alona

Brown, Joseph

Buckley, Aimee

Carbajal, Patricia

Chustz, Jerica

Clement, Kristy

Colomb, Ayanna

Coney, Megan

Coplin, Brian

Crawford, Kristie

Crifasi, Tracey

Cruz-Mitchell, A.

Damon, Leslie

Davis, Kimberly

Davis, Tracy

Dixon, Rosailyn

Domengeaux, J.

Drost, Theresa

Estes, Sarah

Fletcher, Ashley

Flurry, Brandy

Foret, Audra

Free, Malee

Fruge, Paula

Gallman, D.

Garcia, Stacey

Giannobile, C.

Gill, Jessica

Green, Rita

Greene, Madelyn

Griffith, Carol

Grissom, Tara

Guillotte, K.

Hardy, Kaarina

Hartenstein, Aimee

Hasbargen, Brandi

Hayes, Jennifer

Hudson, Darcy

James, Tara

Johnson, April

Johnson, G.

Keesler, Anne M.

Kern, Rochelle

Korfhage, Lea

Korowin, Michael

Lanier-Nabors, J.

Lavergne, Simone

Leblanc, Elena

Lopez, Adam

Lormand, Hallie

Marble, Amy

Marks, Lisa

Matherne, Ellen

Matherne, Renee

Mathews, E.

Matte, Amanda

McNeal, Jennifer

Mixon, Kimberly

Moore, Bridgette

Morgan, Shannon

Morris, Kara

Musfeldt, Robin

Myers, Julie

Navalance, M.

Norvell, Leanne

Ogle, Cherie

Parche’, Shelly

Parkman, Laura

Patten, Anne

Rodgers, Linda

Prat, Anne

Prejean, Aimee

Perich, Audrey

Prakoura, Elena

Prestridge, Karla

Ricaud, Andre

Ricks, Dorothy

Rogers, Rebecca

Rose, Kelly

Sellers-Leaumont, R.

Seneca, April

Simon, Kaci

Rouillier, Leslie

Solomon, Bianca

Rugeley, Sara

Seiler, Karen

Solomon, Denise

Stewart, Gretchen

Stoot, Carol

Talmore, Nichelei

Thibodeaux, M.

Thomas, Tara Jane

Thompson, S.

Tinnerello, Tonya

Toma, Reem

Trahan, Elizabeth

Trahan, Tanya

Tran, Thuy

Tuminaro, Tammra

Van Wagener, E.

Varnado, Chantelle

Vignes, Leah

Whitson, Kerri

Winfrey, Michelle

Young, Carmen

Zahn,Ashley

 

[Back to Top]

 

 This website created by Onesimus Internet Solutions, Inc.